There are lots of products made under license all over the world. IMO It isn't valid to suggest that this is the causative factor without substantiating it?
Nelly
Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not, Nelly, but just in case - would you consider it valid to suggest the TYRES are either poorly designed or poorly executed without eliminating other factors?
For example, if all of the failed tyres have been made in one place, or one general area, than you'd be right in questioning the manufacture process in that country/area.
There have been a few reports of the tyres failing catastrophically - but many, many more reports on the tyres blistering on a hot day, when ridden aggressively.
Methinks one leads to another - the tyre blisters, then the blister pops and the tyre delaminates.
Now, this is just my opinion of likely cause, and I might be a long way off - but it seems more reasonable to be looking at the variables (country/method of manufacture/area centric raw materials) rather than just the tyre itself.
I still wont put them on my bike until this is resolved - I don't trust my assumptions enough to risk my life on a known potential failure, but I'm thinking purely on a scale perspective, there have been many thousands of these sold, and only 3 catastrophic failures that I've heard of, plus a dozen or more in which the tyre has blistered and been taken off, possibly prior to catastrophic failure.
If possibly, it is a Asian country, just for the purposes of example, it gives good reason why Michelin might be tight-lipped, not wanting to ruin a potentially lucrative business relationship with a country or area, and just put it down to isolated incidents more easily explained by user error.
Cheers,
Rick