FZ09Bandit
�� Paramedic ��
90 mitsu eclipse gsx untill a connecting rod shot through rlthe block, three weeks after I bought it. But I do drive a 1973 gran torino its a beast.
Ahh..just read up and it appears I know less than I thought about Mazda. I am a DSM man at heart.
Both the RX-7 and 8 run their rotary motor, but the 3rd generation (1993) motor had a sequential twin turbo setup. Interesting stuff.
All mazda RX-x had Rotaries I believe RX-7 FC (2nd generation RX-7) was the fist one turboed from factory i remember they had a FC turbo-II edition FD's came twinturbo all over the world, US marked had NA auto version as well. RX-8 is the same displacement 2-rotor 1.3L wankel however its "Renesis" out of the box it produses same numbers as FD motor however has no potential when turboed. FD motors run 600hp with a bigger turbo and a nice port job.
All cars of that era in the same class were twin turbo:
Mitsubishi 3000gt (v6 tt)
Toyota Supra (i6 tt)
Mazda RX-7 (2rotor tt)
Nissan 300zx (v6 tt)
Oh the good ol' days
A Nissan Murano here for a common person ... no way, you have to be pretty wealthy or a gangster jijiji
Spock...very different indeed. A person with no wealth at all and a low paying job can finance or lease a very expensive car here very easily. You definitely cannot not judge wealth by the type of car someone drives (in the US).
I thought all the Colombian gansters drove Isuzu Troopers? :BLAA:
Isn't the rotary set up in the RX-8?
Thing of the past? They still have some of the best performance cars in the 20k-35k range and about that renisis -sp? I herd that mazda offer the first rebuild on them for free because they wernt lasting to long, imo mainly because ppl who own the rx8s dont drive them like tthey were ment to be driven....above 6k alot
Sent from my R800x using Tapatalk
i believe. nad the rx8 has a larger displacement than the 7s did
motors do indeed like to sit around 6-7k.