@Kriswithak
Unskilled riders, sure. Cause ABS is bad almost 100% of the cars here in Germany have it. You could say the same on car ABS but this is pretty normal here.
I think its just a joke to say, "who needs ABS is unskilled". Thats just people like you that say who rides with ABS is uncool and unskilled. I rode 14 years without ABS, now I have ABS and love this feature.
When you read in motorcycle boards you often can see that even skilled riders over-break theire front wheel in a _emergency_ situation and going down. I am personally convinced that most experienced riders can't fullfill a correct braking maneuver in a emergency situation.
And one more thing is, that ABS has no negative points on the driving style. You can even put a FZ6 ABS on the frontwheel if you want. If you brake that way.
On the other hand, why he should practise his skill (and the ONLY one skill regarding ABS/no-ABS is the skill to match the point just before the front wheel locks) when he never will have this problem with ABS? For sure he must/will ride carefully when he rides a bike without ABS from time to time. The only skill as ABS rider you didn't need to learn is to match the point before the lock.
So what? Your wheels will never lock.
All the other skills are the same for ABS or non-ABS riders.
In a emergency situation I would choose a middle-experienced rider with ABS before a experienced rider without ABS to be the one behind me.
Sorry, but I really can't hear that "who needs ABS is to unexperienced to drive a motorcycle" anymore...
If youre so "skilled" then drive without it. If a emergency situation comes, you will see if you manage it. (it=not to lock the front wheel).
I am happy that I didn't need to manage it anymore. Not on leaves, not on rain, not on a sandy street. Just brake full an cocentrate on the street/on the emergency situation instead of the front wheel.
Just my 2 cents.
BR
Robert
Totally misconstrued my post there. I'll endeavour to explain because that wasn't the point I was making at all.
Firstly you totally fail to understand my main point. You shouldn't need to use your brakes in a fashion in which you will lock them up, if you are your already placing yourself in danger, and your problems are probably greater than lacking ABS. As you said they are an emergency feature.
A skilled rider totally avoids the situation in the first place by being more aware, more skilled and simply more careful. There is room for arguement whether all incidents are avoidable, but personally I prefer to argue they are, because when you start saying they are not, your passing on the blame and starting to put yourself in risky situations without taking responsibility.
Its not JUST the skill of knowing the lockup point, because that lockup point varies by conditions. Its a far greater awareness.
Whether I am riding, driving or walking down the road I don't do this because its important to be aware, and realise that just because I may not be technically at fault, or someone did something unexpected if I am dead, injured or have caused similar to someone else in the end I do need to take responsibility. Some people may not feel the same, but I couldn't live with that guilt, and would prefer not to be dead/injured.
I also didn't say ABS makes people unskilled, it simply removes a skill that they should probably have learnt during their education. If you can't gauge where and when that lockup point is then you are relying on technology to do it for you. Its probably not an issue if you only ever drive/ride an ABS vehicle, but as my example stated
when thats not the case issues occur. Also knowing how those road hazards will change braking distance is important, and in many ways ABS can and probably will take away that knowledge as people are able to rely on it to keep them safe in -most- situations they probably should have been
more careful in. See what I'm getting at?
Claiming ABS has no downside is kind of shortsighted. Despite giant leaps in technology the general consensus from research is that accidents haven't been reduced drastically. Why? Because as people rely more on technology for safety they take more risks. A friend of mine is actually doing research on this here in Aus after leaving Uni and was telling me exactly that and getting very frustrated because I found it hard to beleive.
One interesting point that can show this is how in a US state when helmets where made a legal requirement to riding a motorcycle they saw a drastic increase in accidents and deaths, as people took more risks.
One thing you notice the reviewers of ABS will state again and again is that they would do things usually unsafe with an ABS vehicle because it would compensate for them, and they find pushing this limit to be interesting and fun. Its a valid point for a comparison, but personally I don't see it as being all that relevant on the road when that kind of behaviour can end your, or another persons life. Also considering they are probably already skilled you can't really properly compare their use of ABS to someone without that skill.
Also I'd like to try and demonstrate a small point about how they will judge safety for ABS vehicles. They will probably get ABS vehicles and non ABS vehicles and compare accident rates (and probably not even consider what kind of accidents).
Now since its a new feature on motorcycles and is relatively expensive and heavy you will find that people wanting the most sports orientated bike may forgo that extra weight beleiving it will make them faster, or many people who don't have that extra money as they may be newer or less experienced riders will also take this option, right away you have two major contributing factors that will make ABS look safer, sports riders possibly the more aggressive rev head kind may be avoiding ABS, while newer riders likewise chose not to afford it. Two already high risk groups.
This is just a likely example, but if you think about it you really can't rely on blatant unexplained figures without seeing they have been reached by the right methods, which generally most industries won't do because its more expensive and time consuming.
Also as you state almost all cars have ABS, I'm assuming you mean new cars since older generation cars often don't unless you don't have many older cars on the road which I concede is possible. Now I would love to see the figures that show ABS has had a noticeable difference on accident figures, based on yearly ABS % on vehicles, compared to the yearly accident figures that match. Keeping in mind in most accidents whether braking was an issue or not is probably not even included in the stats it seems unlikely that any kind of accurate figure will have been gathered.
What really strikes me about your post is that your happy to pass on your good braking habits responsibility to a peice of machinery on the motorcycle.
With your ABS comparison for someone braking behind you, I'd personally not want you - relying on your ABS to make up for your possible mistakes to be behind me, why because someone with less skill will hopefully have been more cautious and left more braking distance rather than relying on their bikes ABS.
Also I find your road conditions comment rather rediculous, in those conditions you will still take relatively the same distance to stop, you seem to be overlooking the fact that you should have taken that hazard into account by being a good rider.
Honestly you seem to be showing yourself to be exactly what you misconstrued from my post. You can't just concentrate on the emergency/road when your ignoring the surface you are on because "ABS WILL DEAL WITH IT!"
I don't have ABS, but having heard good things hopefully my next bike will be available with it. However I have learnt valuable lessons without having accidents by finding the limits of my skills and my bike. Lessons probably not learnt by someone using ABS unless when they are used suddenly red lights flash all over their display and bike, showing they have done something wrong that the bike corrected for it.