• Welcome to the Yamaha FZ6 Forums. Member registration disables ads and allows you to post and share. Register Here.

Palomar mountain... Gravity game

So a rolling mass that's say 3 tons is going to be rolling at a higher speed (3 times?) down a slope compared to a 1 ton rolling mass?

Yes - if the aerodynamic efficiency, and the rolling resistance of the two is the same!

As the two get moving the 3x heavier mass is trading it's 3x gravitational potential energy to produce velocity, and it does so at the same rate as the 1x mass - the rate of acceleration remains the same. However when the 1x mass is trading all of it's gravitational energy to maintain the same velocity - it's terminal velocity - the 3x heavier mass is only using 1x gravitational potential energy and the remaining 2x energy continues to accelerate that mass even further - it's terminal velocity is higher.

So humperdinkel wins!

The main point is gravitational acceleration is only uniform in a vacuum - it does not apply in any other context.

Love the video Moto!
 
Last edited:
Yes - if the aerodynamic efficiency, and the rolling resistance of the two is the same!

As the two get moving the 3x heavier mass is trading it's 3x gravitational potential energy to produce velocity, and it does so at the same rate as the 1x mass - the rate of acceleration remains the same. However when the 1x mass is trading all of it's gravitational energy to maintain the same velocity - it's terminal velocity - the 3x heavier mass is only using 1x gravitational potential energy and the remaining 2x energy continues to accelerate that mass even further - it's terminal velocity is higher.

So humperdinkel wins!

The main point is gravitational acceleration is only uniform in a vacuum - it does not apply in any other context.

Yeah but... remembering f=ma the greater mass will require more force to accelerate it so although it is heavier in order to develop the same enertia they become equal.... in a vacuum :D

Edit: Actually that law still remains whether there is vacuum or atmosphere but rate of acceleration changes...:rolleyes:

The vacuum part is relative to wind resistance. If we could take the mass of a marble and physically flatten it to create equal wind resistance the acceleration of the feather and the marble would at some point equal out...in a non vacuum...
 
Last edited:
Blah x factor mass blah!

Go back and do it no handed coasting and I'll be impressed. Really, I want to see the vid.

I practice no handed coasting on all my bikes on roads just a tight. Those switch backs are tough at 5-10 mph no handed. There is one on Iowa hill Road that is a left handed that I rarely can do without grabbing the bars.
 
Just to shut you all up bickering:

Modern day sleighs combine light metals, steel runners, and an aerodynamic composite body. Competition sleighs must be a maximum of 3.80 m (12.5 ft) long (4-crew) or 2.70 m (8.9 ft) long (2-crew). The runners on both are set at 0.67 m (2.2 ft) gauge. Until the weight-limit rule was added in 1952, bobsleigh crews tended to be very heavy. Now, the maximum weight, including crew, is 630 kg (1,388.9 lbs) (4-man), 390 kg (859.8 lbs) (2-man), or 340 kg (749.6 lbs) (2-woman). Metal weights may be added to reach these limits, as greater weight makes for a faster run.

Bobsleigh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Just to shut you all up bickering:

Modern day sleighs combine light metals, steel runners, and an aerodynamic composite body. Competition sleighs must be a maximum of 3.80 m (12.5 ft) long (4-crew) or 2.70 m (8.9 ft) long (2-crew). The runners on both are set at 0.67 m (2.2 ft) gauge. Until the weight-limit rule was added in 1952, bobsleigh crews tended to be very heavy. Now, the maximum weight, including crew, is 630 kg (1,388.9 lbs) (4-man), 390 kg (859.8 lbs) (2-man), or 340 kg (749.6 lbs) (2-woman). Metal weights may be added to reach these limits, as greater weight makes for a faster run.

Bobsleigh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who's bickerin!? :D
 
Back
Top