I dont really see the looks part... the bike seems odd lookign to me... dont get me wrong, i like it, and the idea of who its being made for... I actually have talked a few people into looking at the R model, just because they are newer riders and such. Its a really good bike for what its designed for.
Now, the way i see it, (and feel free to flame me throughout the post) The R1 is just a bad ass big boy bike. The R6 is your weekend rider, power/race bike, the fz6 is for the people who want a nice fast bike, but with a little more confort for the long haul, and the R model is for people who are new to the bike scene, want a good looking bike, something thats not tiny like the 250, still gets respect, but wont get them it too much trouble. Its a great bike... BUT to compare it to the FZ6 and say its "better" is bogus. Just like saying the FZ6 is better than the R6. The R might be better for new riders, but its not better for everyone. Just as the FZ6 might be better for long trips, but not "better" than the R6 all around.
As i said though, going back to the looks, i think the rear end looks funny and empty... put next to a R6 it just looks.. i dunno. like its unevenly proportioned front to back...... but its all in what you want.
but the fz looks a little goofy too...