Performance Data

Phil_RC_1

07-FZ6, 09-FZ1, 06-R*
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
TN. USA
Visit site
Thank! Very interesting... It seems that the 04 is quicker then the 07???:beer:

Well, data like this has to taken with a grain of salt (so to speak). Different days probably different riders would acount for small variations in times and even HP numbers, but yeah, taken at face value, the data does suggest that the 04 is slightly quicker then the 07.
 

DeusEx

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2011
Messages
75
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Athens
Visit site
My fz6 naked 2005 is quicker than my brothers fazer 600 faired 2007.
Yamaha programmed the ecu's powercurve slightly different in the > 2007 models to get better mpg and smoother powerband, thats why they are slower...
 

CBallman

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Dennison, Minnesota
Visit site
Not sure if I 100% agree with the data....bikes are different I understand but I have a stock 2004 Fz6 and I've gone over 136 mph....so me being the engineer that I am, I'm always skeptical when i find 1 thing wrong theres probably something else, but like what was stated earlier there were probably different riders with different conditions
 

cap'n

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
453
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Location
Cambridge, MA
Visit site
Not sure if I 100% agree with the data....bikes are different I understand but I have a stock 2004 Fz6 and I've gone over 136 mph....so me being the engineer that I am, I'm always skeptical when i find 1 thing wrong theres probably something else, but like what was stated earlier there were probably different riders with different conditions

You know about the 7% difference between indicated dash speed and GPS (ie real) speed right?
 

fazil

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
922
Reaction score
14
Points
18
Location
Istanbul
Visit site
mpg difference looks dramatic:


04- 05 : 39.4 mpg
06-09 : 52.8 mpg

If this is true. I should change my 2004 Fz6 right away.
May be just changing the ecu would be enough.
Or just Co adjustments :)
 
Last edited:

REO Scorpio

Senior Member
Elite Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
466
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Woodridge, IL
Visit site
mpg difference looks dramatic:


04- 05 : 39.4 mpg
06-09 : 52.8 mpg

If this is true. I should change my 2004 Fz6 right away.
May be just changing the ecu would be enough.
Or just Co adjustments :)

Lol maybe my 09 is really an '04 masquerading as a late model. My lifetime mpg is right at 39!




Sent from my iPhone 4 using Tapatalk
 

Phil_RC_1

07-FZ6, 09-FZ1, 06-R*
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
TN. USA
Visit site
Not sure if I 100% agree with the data....bikes are different I understand but I have a stock 2004 Fz6 and I've gone over 136 mph....so me being the engineer that I am, I'm always skeptical when i find 1 thing wrong theres probably something else, but like what was stated earlier there were probably different riders with different conditions

Cap'n is right, speedo error can be anywhere from 5% up to 10% on some bikes. Also, they didn't specify what distance they tested the max speed. I mean, if you only give it a mile, maybe you only get 136mph, but most of us will go as far as the bike is still accelerating, but I'm sure they have some specific max distance that they test within.

Of coarse there is always typo's or human error. On a data collection like this, I think there's always a high possibility of a typo or two. With that being said, any data that is important to you should be corroborated by at least two other sources.
 
Last edited:
Top