I agree...sort of. If you are going to measure MotoGP success by number of wins, then there are a lot of failors that have been, and still are on the MotoGP grid. If you just sort back through the last 5 years, how many riders have won a MotoGP race? Not many...they have been dominated by the few. Just wondering, do you think Casey or Valentino would win on the Tech3?
I think Stoner would give it a pretty good go on the Tech 3. He proved it by how well he punted that Ducati donkey around the track. Just like the Ducati though, he would be right on the edge, and crash more though. Rossi...well, he's on the donkey now, and we saw how hard he found it to get around the track. Ducati, have thrown plenty of money at it now, and it still only got a podium because of Sideshow Bob thinking he's playing Road Rash.
Back on topic

I think there is so much skill in pushing any of these bikes around the track that I would hesitate to call any of these guys failures. However most of the WSBK guys that go into MotoGP do struggle a bit. To start of with, they usually get second class rides, but look at Ben Spies. He's got a factory bike now, and considering the great job he did in WSBK, he is struggling in MotoGP. A clear indication to me that the guys out in front in MotoGP are definitely the elite.
If you really want to see some "Blow your mind" racing, you can do a lot worse than check out any of the road racing series in the UK. These guys are freaking out there

....LMAO. Balls of steel.:rockon:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4Inx7LwsHo&feature=related]YouTube - 2007 ULSTER GRAND PRIX SUPERSPORT‏[/ame]