Based on my 16 years experience with it, the stock Fazer was fine for me and the way I ride, all I changed was the pipe.
If you want to go faster, buy a faster bike.
I sold my Fazer and bought a Tracer, again all I have changed is the pipe, it is fine for my requirements.
My comments are just my opinion.
I was asking what specifically in this thread leads you to this conclusion? i.e. Why is "stock is good enough" the moral of this story? Not why is it the moral of your story.
And sure, the 9 and its derivatives are marginally faster in a straight line than the 6, but that's only one part of going faster. I'd say the following 3 things are more important:
1. Consistent brakes, so that you can brake progressively harder with a predictable outcome
2. Good suspension, so that you can brake, turn in, and exit a corner optimally
3. Good fueling, so that you can enter corners without interfering engine braking, and exit on the gas without disrupting the bike
The stock 9s might be worse the stock 6 in the latter 2 categories, and are certainly worse than a modified 6 in all three. I found the stock 9 I rode to have a snatchy throttle, and scary suspension/geometry. Can this be fixed? Of course. I would for sure go faster (around corners) on my current FZ6 than a stock 9. You could recreate my FZ6 for 4-5k. You could maybe get a comparable 9 for 7-8k, and that's if you want a torquey triple. I like the inline 4.
It's economical and practical to find a bike that fits your form factor, power band preference, and budget, and to fill in the gaps where the manufacture prioritized margins over performance.