Rear Brake Old-biker advice

Jacobien

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
173
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Pretoria South Africa
Visit site
Ok, just spoke (had an tiny argument) with a novice biker. He says you should use the rear brake when riding normally and only use the front in emergencies. :disapprove:

I use the front during normal riding as the rear is too easy to lock up. I use both in emergencies finding the balance between front and rear. The front also has a better feel to me.

He also stated that he frequently locks-up the rear, so how does it make sense to him?

Anywayz, is there some kind of old biking wisdom that I am missing here??? :D

Peace
 

pt1979

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Austria, Bruckneudorf
Visit site
front brakes = main brakes for me.
rear brakes = for stabilizing the bike and when I need "full brake power", which means I use front AND rear brakes.

that's also what an Instructor told us at the last safety training.
Ex-Race Driver and instructor for more than 15years.
I go with his opinion... :thumbup:
 

Kazza

Administrator aka Mrs Prebstar
Moderator
Elite Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Messages
8,796
Reaction score
121
Points
0
Location
Chittering Valley, West Aust.
Visit site
front brakes = main brakes for me.
rear brakes = for stabilizing the bike and when I need "full brake power", which means I use front AND rear brakes.

that's also what an Instructor told us at the last safety training.
Ex-Race Driver and instructor for more than 15years.
I go with his opinion... :thumbup:

I'm with you ^^^^^^^


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Davey

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
262
Reaction score
14
Points
0
Location
Paris, France
Visit site
Front brakes have much more stopping power than the rear. For me it's always my main brake, but I do use the rear brake quite a bit too. It depends on the situation of course.

Emergency braking = both. Normal riding mostly front, with a little rear if needed while cornering to avoid losing/diving the front. But for maneuvers like turning around at slow speeds I always drag the rear and never touch the front to avoid the fork diving and losing balance.

However, normal riding using the rear as the main brake sounds not right to me!
 

krushnuts

Where did I put my keys..
Elite Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
391
Reaction score
12
Points
0
Location
Brisbane
Visit site
+1000

Front = 90% of your breaking power. When you break, the weight of the bike goes forward, so much that the rear of the bike becomes very light, or even leaves the ground in extreem circumstances... Rear brake does reduce the distance to stop, so using it very lightly when hard front breaking can help you stop that extra meter or two, which could make the difference!

Using the rear break just a little whilst making slow turns can also help stabilise the bike.
 

wolfe1down

Go hard or go home!
Elite Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
956
Reaction score
50
Points
0
Location
Barrie, Ontario
Visit site
There is a reason that the front wheel has two disc brakes on it, and the rear only one. Most of your stopping power is on the front end, and there the physics works for you. :thumbup:

+1
 

Tailgate

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
2,086
Reaction score
26
Points
0
Location
Sacramento, CA
Visit site
As you said, "...a NOVICE biker." Not much different from somebody saying, for example, "you should only use your car's emergency brake for normal braking, don't use your front brakes." What else does novice biker say: "Under normal circumstances, you should only use your left hand (if you're right-handed) to wipe your butt"?
 
S

Shamus McFeeley

There is a reason that the front wheel has two disc brakes on it, and the rear only one. Most of your stopping power is on the front end, and there the physics works for you. :thumbup:

+1

If this was a person used to older bikes, they might be thinking of having only 1 front rotor. I've had a few bikes from the 80's era and some of them had brakes that can only be described as "wooden". The CB400T I had was like this. Still not a good idea to translate into the modern era with.
 

novaks47

Yeah!
Joined
Jul 3, 2010
Messages
638
Reaction score
6
Points
0
Location
Pescadero, CA
Visit site
If this was a person used to older bikes, they might be thinking of having only 1 front rotor. I've had a few bikes from the 80's era and some of them had brakes that can only be described as "wooden". The CB400T I had was like this. Still not a good idea to translate into the modern era with.

Either that, or he's used to BMX bikes. Seriously, when I went from BMX to mountain bikes, it took me forever to actually start using the front brakes!
 

deeptekkie

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
823
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Location
TN
Visit site
I just use them both in unison, (and the way I ride it usually takes both of them : ) !
All seriousness aside: Experience is the best teacher and every bike is different, (just like road surfaces). Your front brake is by far the most powerful but there are times when it can get you into trouble too.
 
Top